The blog that shapes the future of CM and unravels how to achieve process excellence through Enterprise Configuration Management.
For more information, go to the
This article discusses the challenges organizations face due to siloed structures, as highlighted by Conway’s Law. It emphasizes the importance of a change process in fostering cross-functional collaboration, enabling better communication between departments. The author advocates for configuration management as a means to effectively manage change and break down silos, ultimately enhancing organizational efficiency.
This article is part of the How Do YOU CM2? blog series in collaboration with the Institute for Process Excellence (IpX). Although I receive compensation for writing this series, I stand behind its content. I will continue to create and publish high-quality articles that I can fully endorse. Enjoy this new series, and please share your thoughts! In my…
This article discusses the challenges organizations face due to siloed structures, as highlighted by Conway’s Law. It emphasizes the importance of a change process in fostering cross-functional collaboration, enabling better communication between departments. The author advocates for configuration management as a means to effectively manage change and break down silos, ultimately enhancing organizational efficiency.
This article discusses the importance of ongoing verification in the First Article Inspection (FAI) and Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) in aerospace and automotive industries. Both processes ensure that changes in production do not affect part quality, emphasizing the need for continuous oversight and accountability beyond initial approvals.
The failure of Ariane 5’s maiden flight stemmed from an inertial reference system designed for Ariane 4, which was inadequate for its faster velocity. This incident highlights the dangers of assuming prior success in similar systems without reassessing their applicability to new contexts. Verification methods must include clear scope definitions to prevent such oversights.
Thomas Jefferson observed two key demonstrations of interchangeability: Honoré Blanc’s honest display in 1785, where random parts fit perfectly, and Eli Whitney’s staged 1801 demonstration, which misled observers and led to delays. The outcomes reflect the importance of who selects components during tests, emphasizing the need for impartiality in acceptance evaluations.
On August 30, 1785, Thomas Jefferson observed a demonstration by Honore Blanc, showing the interchangeability of musket lock parts. This highlighted the importance of validation over mere declarations. The article discusses modern challenges in proving interchangeability, emphasizing a structured process to ensure claims are supported by evidence and not just assumptions.
Agentic AI agile AI AI/ML artificial intelligence baseline change management change process CIB CM cm-game CM2 CM2 Baseline CM Baseline cm game CM Tile CM Tiles configuration management data model dataset document enterprise cm game Governance How Do YOU CM2? identification impact analysis impact matrix interchangeability IpX machine learning MBD MBE MBx ML Model Based newsletter part re-identification PLM podcast Product Lifecycle Management quality re-identification status accounting traceability
[…] Alex Bruskin compared Conway’s Law to gravity in the thread: you cannot switch it off, but you can still…
Thanks for your comment Chris. I like Product Change and can see why Enterprise Change can be misleading.
The consequences of changing any item within a product can certainly be enterprise-wide, but describing every product change as an…
[…] through the change process, without waiting for a reorganization. It is the same problem as in Ignorance is Bliss!…
CM2 certainly strengthens traceability, accountability, and the quality of decision records, but I’d suggest that decision governance and decision quality…