The blog that shapes the future of CM and unravels how to achieve process excellence through Enterprise Configuration Management.
For more information, go to the
On August 30, 1785, Thomas Jefferson observed a demonstration by Honore Blanc, showing the interchangeability of musket lock parts. This highlighted the importance of validation over mere declarations. The article discusses modern challenges in proving interchangeability, emphasizing a structured process to ensure claims are supported by evidence and not just assumptions.
This article discusses the challenges organizations face due to siloed structures, as highlighted by Conway’s Law. It emphasizes the importance of a change process in fostering cross-functional collaboration, enabling better communication between departments. The author advocates for configuration management as a means to effectively manage change and break down silos, ultimately enhancing organizational efficiency.
This article discusses the importance of ongoing verification in the First Article Inspection (FAI) and Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) in aerospace and automotive industries. Both processes ensure that changes in production do not affect part quality, emphasizing the need for continuous oversight and accountability beyond initial approvals.
The failure of Ariane 5’s maiden flight stemmed from an inertial reference system designed for Ariane 4, which was inadequate for its faster velocity. This incident highlights the dangers of assuming prior success in similar systems without reassessing their applicability to new contexts. Verification methods must include clear scope definitions to prevent such oversights.
Thomas Jefferson observed two key demonstrations of interchangeability: Honoré Blanc’s honest display in 1785, where random parts fit perfectly, and Eli Whitney’s staged 1801 demonstration, which misled observers and led to delays. The outcomes reflect the importance of who selects components during tests, emphasizing the need for impartiality in acceptance evaluations.
On August 30, 1785, Thomas Jefferson observed a demonstration by Honore Blanc, showing the interchangeability of musket lock parts. This highlighted the importance of validation over mere declarations. The article discusses modern challenges in proving interchangeability, emphasizing a structured process to ensure claims are supported by evidence and not just assumptions.
The text discusses the critical gap in knowledge retention within manufacturing, particularly as veteran engineers near retirement. It emphasizes that interchangeability assessments rely on historical context often lost when experienced employees leave. Solutions, like capturing decision-making context, are proposed to build “product memory” and ensure continuity for future engineers.
Agentic AI agile AI AI/ML artificial intelligence baseline change management change process CIB CM cm-game CM2 CM2 Baseline CM Baseline cm game CM Tile CM Tiles configuration management data model dataset document enterprise cm game Governance How Do YOU CM2? identification impact analysis impact matrix interchangeability IpX machine learning MBD MBE MBx ML Model Based newsletter part re-identification PLM podcast Product Lifecycle Management quality re-identification status accounting traceability
[…] through the change process, without waiting for a reorganization. It is the same problem as in Ignorance is Bliss!…
Oleg, Product Memory as Knowledge Management The article identifies a significant gap in many product-development organisations, especially those working with…
[…] change hides. And make the re-identification decision itself carry co-signatures from those desks; re-identification is not about following a…
[…] years later, the industry is once again arguing intensely about interchangeability. Last month, in Interchangeable Does Not Mean Identical,…
The consequences of changing any item within a product can certainly be enterprise-wide, but describing every product change as an…