The blog that shapes the future of CM and unravels how to achieve process excellence through Enterprise Configuration Management.
For more information, go to the
On August 30, 1785, Thomas Jefferson observed a demonstration by Honore Blanc, showing the interchangeability of musket lock parts. This highlighted the importance of validation over mere declarations. The article discusses modern challenges in proving interchangeability, emphasizing a structured process to ensure claims are supported by evidence and not just assumptions.
The failure of Ariane 5’s maiden flight stemmed from an inertial reference system designed for Ariane 4, which was inadequate for its faster velocity. This incident highlights the dangers of assuming prior success in similar systems without reassessing their applicability to new contexts. Verification methods must include clear scope definitions to prevent such oversights.
Thomas Jefferson observed two key demonstrations of interchangeability: Honoré Blanc’s honest display in 1785, where random parts fit perfectly, and Eli Whitney’s staged 1801 demonstration, which misled observers and led to delays. The outcomes reflect the importance of who selects components during tests, emphasizing the need for impartiality in acceptance evaluations.
On August 30, 1785, Thomas Jefferson observed a demonstration by Honore Blanc, showing the interchangeability of musket lock parts. This highlighted the importance of validation over mere declarations. The article discusses modern challenges in proving interchangeability, emphasizing a structured process to ensure claims are supported by evidence and not just assumptions.
The text discusses the critical gap in knowledge retention within manufacturing, particularly as veteran engineers near retirement. It emphasizes that interchangeability assessments rely on historical context often lost when experienced employees leave. Solutions, like capturing decision-making context, are proposed to build “product memory” and ensure continuity for future engineers.
The article highlights the issue of parts with duplicate numbers obscuring interchangeable parts. It emphasizes the hidden costs of managing duplicates, which can lead to inefficiencies and lost savings. By implementing better identification schemes, organizations can reclaim the value of interchangeable items, potentially saving millions annually. Understanding and managing these duplicates is essential for operational…
Starting February 18, 2027, EU regulations will require traceability for every EV battery through the Digital Product Passport, mandating records of production details. Effective configuration management is essential for compliance to avoid false declarations. Organizations must treat this regulation as a critical data discipline rather than merely a sustainability exercise.
Agentic AI agile AI AI/ML artificial intelligence baseline change management change process CIB CM cm-game CM2 CM2 Baseline CM Baseline cm game CM Tile CM Tiles configuration management data model dataset document enterprise cm game Governance How Do YOU CM2? identification impact analysis impact matrix IpX machine learning MBD MBE MBx ML Model Based newsletter part re-identification PLM podcast Product Lifecycle Management quality re-identification release status accounting traceability
[…] years later, the industry is once again arguing intensely about interchangeability. Last month, in Interchangeable Does Not Mean Identical,…
[…] definition is Form, Fit, and Function. That view is incomplete. In my book, I argue that true interchangeability requires…
[…] including serviceability, upgradeability, and repair, with all lifecycle stakeholders at the table. Re-identification is not about following a decision…
[…] failed procedurally in that story. The failure is in what the checks never covered, which is why Form, Fit,…
[…] change hides. And make the re-identification decision itself carry co-signatures from those desks; re-identification is not about following a…